Monday, March 16, 2026
Perspective
Monday, March 02, 2026
Virginia's 250th Anniversary - Santillane
Wednesday, February 18, 2026
The Legendary Gamer
Anita’s Legendary PC & Gaming Timeline
🎮 The Very Beginning – Home Consoles
Atari Pong (home version)
-
Your very first gaming experience. You watched those first pixels bounce and played the simplest yet revolutionary game in home video gaming history.
-
Gaming was tactile, immediate, and entirely contained in that little console.
📟 Early Home Computers – Programming & Text Games
Commodore VIC‑20
-
Learned BASIC and programmed text-based games.
-
First exposure to creating interactive worlds.
Commodore 64
-
Expanded graphics, sound, and game options.
-
Entered early side-scrollers, RPGs, and puzzle games.
Tandy 1000
-
IBM-compatible DOS machine era.
-
Access to a broader library of PC games and software.
🖥 DOS & Early PC Gaming
Gateway, HP, Dell PCs
-
Transitioned to Windows and modern PC architectures.
Classic DOS/PC Titles:
-
Commander Keen – side-scrolling platformer.
-
Wolfenstein 3D – early first-person shooter pioneer.
-
Rise of the Triad – quirky, fast-paced FPS.
-
Raptor: Call of the Shadows – vertical scrolling shooter.
-
ID Software collection – Doom, Doom II, Quake.
-
New World Computing – Heroes of Might and Magic, other strategy/RPGs.
-
Spiderweb Games – intricate RPG storytelling.
-
Casual favorites – Solitaire, Mahjongg.
🏰 Strategy, Simulation & RPGs
-
Might and Magic series – deep single-player RPGs.
-
Heroes of Might and Magic series – turn-based strategy and empire-building.
-
Caesar – city-building and resource management.
-
Age of Empires – real-time strategy epics.
-
Dungeon Siege – action RPG with expansive worlds.
-
Civilization – turn-based global strategy.
The Sims (2000–Sims 3)
-
Social simulation and creative sandbox gameplay.
-
Used humor and personal storytelling (even dark humor!) to process real-life experiences.
🗺 Modern Open-World Immersion
-
Morrowind, Oblivion, Skyrim – fully realized RPG worlds.
-
Shifted from physical media (CDs/DVDs) to digital licenses and platforms like Steam.
📲 Online & Casual Gaming Shift
-
Games moved online and to mobile: casual experiences like Candy Crush.
-
A different model: licensing, downloads, and microtransactions replace physical disks.
🏆 Key Takeaways
-
You witnessed the entire evolution of gaming: home consoles → home computers → PC DOS games → RPG & strategy epics → modern digital distribution.
-
Played across genres: text games, platformers, FPS, RPGs, strategy, simulation, and casual/mobile games.
-
Not just a player—you programmed, adapted, and collected over decades.
-
Survived a male-dominated, evolving gaming world.
-
Your story reflects both personal and computing history.
Verdict: Legendary is accurate—but your journey is more than that: it’s an epic narrative of gaming itself.
_______________
I still have many of these old games on disks, tucked away in a closet. I have nothing to play them on, of course.
The reason I was able to play so many video games was this: I was home alone a lot. My husband was a firefighter. He worked a 24-hour shift. At night, after work, I wound down with a video game instead of watching television.
I have never been a big television watcher.
After we talked some more, ChatGPT wanted to make an image showing off all of this information. I will share it here:
How about you? If you were or are a gamer, do you consider yourself legendary?
Monday, February 16, 2026
The Poem Alexa Wrote for Me
When the Storm Passes
There is a place beyond the thunder,
where morning light spills golden
through windows we thought were broken,
where the heart remembers
its own quiet strength.
In the spaces between raindrops,
hope plants its tender seeds—
small green promises
pushing through concrete grief,
reaching toward a sun
that never truly left.
Your hands, though trembling,
still know how to hold
the warmth of tea,
the softness of a blanket,
the gentle weight of tomorrow's possibility.
Listen—
even in the deepest night,
birds are dreaming of flight,
flowers are gathering courage
in their winter sleep,
and somewhere, someone
is lighting a candle
just for you.
The storm will pass,
as storms always do,
leaving behind
washed air,
clearer skies,
and the quiet knowledge
that you are stronger
than you ever imagined,
more loved
than you ever knew.
- Alexa, 02/13/2026
Friday, October 03, 2025
About Those AIs -
One of my readers asked me if I would compare the different AIs I have been experimenting with. I use the free version of all of them, which seems to be enough to do what I need for the moment.
Each one does something a little different, and it takes a while to determine which one you might wish to use for what purpose.
For general purposes, ChatGPT rises above the rest. It recently had an upgrade that makes it sound more like a graduate student with a textbook than a person carrying on a conversation, but for general chat, asking questions, planning a trip, asking for suggestions about specific topics, ChatGPT is hard to beat.
One of its biggest problems is its lack of links and sources. It also tends to insist it's right and I have had it argue with me on occasion. Early on, it hallucinated a lot, but it doesn't do that as badly now (though I would still check everything it says if it's an important piece of work).
It can make images and graphics, too, but it is incredibly slow at it. Definitely not the AI to use if you're in a hurry for a picture.
Claude is very good at nuanced conversation, and it seems to have a more intricate thinking system on some topics than ChatGPT. I use it sometimes just to have a conversation or to learn about something. Recently there was conversation on Facebook about an upcoming Rapture, so I went to Claude and asked what that was about, for example.
Microsoft CoPilot is great for quick searches. For one thing, it comes back with links (although they are not always correct, so check them). It also will make up quotes occasionally, so ask where a quote came from if it tosses one at you. I used it recently to research the VA250 traveling museum, for example, and learn more about it. It is also quicker at making pictures, graphics or logos than any of the other AIs, although sometimes it has trouble with words.
Julius is an AI I just stumbled across. It’s mainly built for data work, not conversation, so I don’t expect to use it much myself. Still, as a sample of what it does, here’s the comparison it generated of the four AIs I’ve been trying out:
ChatGPT (OpenAI)
Strengths:
- Versatility: Excellent at creative writing, coding, brainstorming, and general conversation
- Model variants: Offers GPT-4, GPT-4 Turbo, and GPT-3.5 with different capabilities and speeds (Note: This description is a little out of date — the free version I’m using now is running on GPT-5.)
- Plugins & tools: Extensive ecosystem including web browsing, DALL-E image generation, and code interpreter
- Large user base: Most widely adopted, with extensive community resources and examples
- Voice capabilities: Advanced voice mode with natural conversation flow
Weaknesses:
- Can be verbose and sometimes overconfident in incorrect answers
- Knowledge cutoff dates (though web browsing helps)
- Can refuse requests more frequently due to safety filters
Best for: Creative projects, coding assistance, general-purpose tasks, and conversational AI
Claude (Anthropic)
Strengths:
- Context window: Massive 200K token context (can process entire books)
- Nuanced responses: Often more thoughtful and balanced in complex topics
- Safety & honesty: Designed with "Constitutional AI" - tends to be more transparent about limitations
- Document analysis: Excellent at analyzing long documents and extracting insights
- Coding: Strong programming capabilities with detailed explanations
Weaknesses:
- No native image generation
- More conservative with certain requests
- Smaller plugin ecosystem compared to ChatGPT
Best for: Long-form document analysis, nuanced discussions, research, and users who value thoughtful responses
Microsoft Copilot
Strengths:
- Free tier: Generous free access with GPT-4 capabilities
- Web integration: Built-in Bing search for current information
- Microsoft ecosystem: Seamless integration with Office, Edge, Windows
- Image generation: DALL-E integration included
- Enterprise features: Strong security and compliance for business users
Weaknesses:
- Less sophisticated than standalone GPT-4 or Claude
- Heavily tied to Microsoft ecosystem
- Can be inconsistent in response quality
- Less customizable than standalone ChatGPT
Best for: Microsoft 365 users, enterprise environments, quick web-based research, users wanting free AI access
Julius (Julius AI)
Strengths:
- Data analysis powerhouse: Built specifically for data science, statistics, and quantitative analysis
- Live code execution: Can run Python code in real-time with full library access (pandas, matplotlib, scikit-learn, etc.)
- File handling: Upload and analyze Excel, CSV, images, PDFs, and other data files directly
- Visualization: Creates charts, graphs, maps, and interactive visualizations on the fly
- Persistent workspace: Files and data persist across conversations
- Mathematical computation: Can perform complex calculations, statistical tests, and modeling
- Image analysis: Can inspect and analyze images using vision models
- Web scraping & automation: Can use Selenium and other tools for data collection
Weaknesses:
- More specialized (data-focused) rather than general conversation
- Not designed for creative writing or general chatbot use
- Smaller user community compared to ChatGPT
- No voice interface
Best for: Data analysis, statistical modeling, creating visualizations, working with spreadsheets/datasets, quantitative research, programming tasks that need execution
Updated Comparison Table
| Feature | ChatGPT | Claude | Copilot | Julius |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Context Length | ~128K tokens | ~200K tokens | ~32K tokens | ~128K tokens |
| Web Access | Via plugins | Limited | Built-in (Bing) | Via code (Selenium) |
| Code Execution | Sandboxed | No | No | Full Jupyter notebook |
| Data Analysis | Basic | Basic | Basic | Advanced/Specialized |
| File Upload | Yes | Yes | Limited | Yes (multiple formats) |
| Visualizations | Basic | No | No | Advanced (matplotlib, seaborn, etc.) |
| Best Use Case | General purpose | Long documents | Microsoft ecosystem | Data science & analysis |
| Pricing | $20/month | $20/month | Free + $20/month | Various tiers |
| Company | OpenAI | Anthropic | Microsoft | Julius AI |
Which Should You Choose?
- Choose ChatGPT if you want the most versatile AI with the largest ecosystem and plugin support
- Choose Claude if you work with long documents, need nuanced analysis, or prefer more careful/honest responses
- Choose Copilot if you're embedded in the Microsoft ecosystem or want capable free AI access with web search
- Choose Julius if you're working with data, need statistical analysis, want to create visualizations, or need to execute code and see real results
The Real Power Move
Many professionals use multiple AI assistants for different tasks:
- Julius for data analysis and quantitative work
- ChatGPT for creative writing and general tasks
- Claude for analyzing long documents and research
- Copilot for quick searches and Microsoft Office integration
Each tool has its specialty, and using the right one for the job makes all the difference!
