Saturday, August 09, 2025
Saturday 9: Shout
Friday, August 08, 2025
August Happiness Challenge Day #8
______________________________________________________________________
About the August Happiness Challenge
Each day in August you are to post about something that makes *you* happy. Pretty simple. And, it doesn't even have to be every day if you don't want it to be. It's a great way to remind ourselves that there are positive things going on in our lives, our communities, and the world.
Thursday, August 07, 2025
Thursday Thirteen
I took a long time to get both my bachelor's degree and my master's degree. My bachelors took me eight long years to obtain. It came from Hollins College, and two years later, the college changes its name to Hollins University.
I began working on my master's immediately after graduating with my BA, but then decided I needed a break. I went back to it in 2002 and finally finished it in 2012. I took it a class at a time, as I could afford it and as my work and my health allowed. They were long-term goals, and I met them.
So, without further ado, here is what my effort to obtain both degrees taught me.
1. A degree is not a finish line, but a conversation with time. The degree is just a piece of paper, but it represents the culmination of many hours of work.
2. Eight years can be a pilgrimage, not a delay. While I was at the college for a very long time, that allowed me to seek out different professors and also to become personal friends with some of the professors that I saw from year to year. In a way, I became a fixture at the college because I was there off and on so much.
3. Learning is not linear, and neither is becoming. It took me a long time to find my footing when I went back to school. I was an older student at the age of 22 and married. My life experiences were different from my classmates, who were younger (and generally not as dedicated because they weren't paying for their degree, their parents were).
4. Returning to the classroom, especially years later, is its own kind of courage. It was hard to go back for my masters, but the experience was incredibly rewarding. And there was a great change in the way students interacted from 2002 to 2012. In 2002, I made friends of my classmates during breaks. By 2012, everyone veered off into their own little corner to check in on their phones with family and friends. The classroom experience changed in those 10 years.
5. A BA earned in 1993 and an MA in 2012 are not endpoints, but waypoints. They are markers in my life, ways I can remember what happened when.
6. The voice you find at Hollins may take years to fully claim. Hollins has a strong creative writing program, but it also could be snobbish. Hollins may not be the place for someone who really only wants to write Nancy Drew books or romances. Hollins is the place to write the Great American Novel (think Pilgrim at Tinker Creek, by Annie Dillard). It took me a while to find myself and make sure my voice was my own, and not the reflection of my professors or some other writer.
7. Education is not just what you study, but what you survive. Hollins had a major flooding event in 1985, my first year there. The Flood of '85 wiped out the school library and classes ended up being cancelled for at least a month. It was an abbreviated semester, for sure. I personally had to survive many surgeries and health issues that forced me drop out for several semesters. Yet I kept going.
8. The institution may change names, but the imprint remains. I was not all that happy with the name change from Hollins College to Hollins University, but I understood it. The college didn't change with the name change, but it has certainly changed over time as the world has changed. One big difference? When I graduated in 1993, the cars around the campus were BMWs and Mercedes. When I graduated in 2012, the cars were Toyotas and SUVs.
9. Some lessons wait patiently until you’re ready to hear them. One of the courses I took, Imaginative Thinking, stuck with me for a long time. But it wasn't until I was in my 40s that I realized what the professors were trying to teach me - that I could be freer in my expression and less controlled.
10. Your story doesn’t need to match anyone else’s syllabus. I did the lessons, but my homework definitely was different, thanks to my age. Some of my professors appreciated having an older and quite dedicated student in class, others, not so much.
11. That persistence is a kind of artistry. Honestly, if anyone had told me I'd stick to working on my BA for eight long years, I'd have said no way. I used to think I didn't do things long term, but that was definitely long term. (And this blog has been here since August 2006, (19 years!) happy birthday, Blue Country Magic!)
12. That time itself can be a teacher. I learned so much about myself during my journey at Hollins. I learned to think, to understand, to be empathetic. I learned to give myself grace when I was ill and do the same for others. And I learned that eventually, with enough patience and dedication, I could do anything.
13. I wasn't late. I was layered. I took a different route, one I never expected, toward my degrees. I hadn't anticipated marrying at 20, getting a two-year AS degree in 1989 (I took classes concurrently at Hollins and Virginia Western Community College, transferring credits back and forth) and finally my BA in 1993. Nor had I predicted that I would spend so much time in the hospital or have so many surgeries. Lots happened to me. It all made me who I am.
Wednesday, August 06, 2025
August Happiness Day #6
My husband took his mom grocery shopping today, and he brought home cupcakes!
______________________________________________________________________
About the August Happiness Challenge
Each day in August you are to post about something that makes *you* happy. Pretty simple. And, it doesn't even have to be every day if you don't want it to be. It's a great way to remind ourselves that there are positive things going on in our lives, our communities, and the world.
Tuesday, August 05, 2025
August Happiness Challenge Day #5
______________________________________________________________________
About the August Happiness Challenge
Each day in August you are to post about something that makes *you* happy. Pretty simple. And, it doesn't even have to be every day if you don't want it to be. It's a great way to remind ourselves that there are positive things going on in our lives, our communities, and the world.
Monday, August 04, 2025
August Happiness Challenge Day #4
Today I am happy that saw a fawn in the front yard and not in my garden. (Sorry, I didn't get a picture.)
______________________________
About the August Happiness Challenge
Each day in August you are to post about something that makes *you* happy. Pretty simple. And, it doesn't even have to be every day if you don't want it to be. It's a great way to remind ourselves that there are positive things going on in our lives, our communities, and the world."
Five Things
Sunday, August 03, 2025
August Happiness Challenge Day #3
Sunday Stealing
I encourage you to visit other participants in Sunday Stealing posts and leave a comment. Cheers to all us thieves who love memes, however we come by them.
Saturday, August 02, 2025
August Happiness Challenge: Day 2
Today I am happy that my friends Chad and Sage agreed to work with me on a project. (Shhh. It's a secret, for now!)
Saturday 9: Jive Talkin'
Friday, August 01, 2025
August Happiness Challenge, Day 1
Thursday, July 31, 2025
Thursday 13
Tuesday, July 29, 2025
Trust the Algorhythm. What Could Go Wrong?
Hannah Natanson, Jeff Stein, Dan Diamond, and Rachel Siegel of the Washington Post reported today that staff associated with the “Department of Government Efficiency” are using artificial intelligence to eliminate half of the government’s regulations by next January. James Burnham, former chief attorney for DOGE, told the reporters: “Creative deployment of artificial intelligence to advance the president’s regulatory agenda is one logical strategy to make significant progress” during Trump’s term.
How do the technology billionaires go around with confidence that their AI is so great when it obviously is not?
I have been playing with ChatGPT and Microsoft's Copilot for months now. I have pushed ChatGPT with various questions. I have examined it about space, time, reality. I have asked it stupid questions, not stupid questions, and everything in between.
About 90 percent of the time, ChatGPT does a good job.
It's the other 10 percent of the time that is the concern. At least that much, maybe more, ChatGPT in particular simply hallucinates and makes up stuff. It fills in "facts" that aren't even there. It creates fiction out of thin air.
CoPilot, which is a lesser AI, doesn't generally do this, and for research or what-have-you, it works well. It's not as in-depth as ChatGPT, but I don't expect it to be because I know it's more for home and public use.
Regardless, these things are not cut out to reform the federal government.
AI models do not think. They parrot, repeat, and possibly anticipate, but they do not think. They cannot perceive that cutting air pollution controls, say, would make asthmatics out of a certain percentage of the population, and outright kill some of us who already walk around with an inhaler.
They are no better than the programmers who program them and the data they use to do that.
This is a marketing issue. The tech billionaires are so sure their product is great that they're trying desperately to sell it for what it is not: a "human" brain.
What they think it can do and what it actually can do are not the same thing, and this is not going to bode well for the population.
These billionaires and the companies they run have a huge financial stake in making AI seem like a revolutionary tool that can do everything from write poetry to manage economies. The more the public and governments believe that narrative, the more funding, stock value, and influence those companies gain. It's not about truth. It's about sales.
The public in general, and even some of the executives in these big companies, do not understand how large language models work. They think it’s intelligent in a human way, but it is really just advanced pattern matching and prediction based on training data. An AI model doesn't "know" anything. It doesn’t "understand" laws or ethics. Not the way I do. And not the way you do, either.
These same people also believe that every complex human or political problem, whether that is poverty, racism, bureaucracy, or inefficiency, can be "solved" with software. This is an incredibly flawed way of thinking, but these self-made "men" see themselves as the smart guys who should be in charge of everything.
And if you're a wanna-be authoritarian in charge of a dying democracy, and you want to rapidly dismantle regulations and other things that your guy pals dislike, then AI offers a convenient tool.
It can also be the scapegoat. The leader can claim efficiency and modernization while gutting environmental, labor, and consumer protections. And if things go wrong, he can blame the AI model.
AI models have no accountability. No one has yet sued open.ai because ChatGPT told them they had cancer when they didn't, or vice versa, or whatever it might take to force such lawsuits to come into play. Even so, the AI model itself isn't going to go to jail, and most likely neither will the programmers. They'll just say, "oops" and that will be the end of it.
AI models are not accurate or nuanced enough to handle legal, regulatory, or ethical interpretation. I have experienced its flaws in a myriad of ways in the last several months. It can hallucinate facts, miss tone, misunderstand nuance, or completely misread human intent. Now imagine that happening with laws on toxic waste disposal, disability rights, or air travel safety.
AI is powerful, but it is not magic. Nor is it wise. It has no wisdom except, again, what the programmers give it. Using AI to "reform" the government is dangerous. Not because the technology itself is dangerous, but the hubris of those who wield it without humility or caution can cause great damage.
When billionaires or government officials use AI as a hammer to smash through democratic safeguards, the public must push back and demand human oversight, transparency, and ethical guardrails.
Monday, July 28, 2025
Five Things
Last week, I:
1. had a mammogram. Do it, ladies!
2. saw the chiropractor.
3. watched the Board of Supervisors meeting.
4. went to the grocery store.
5. did the usual chores.
In solidarity with federal workers, I started listing 5 things I did last week every Monday. I don't know if they still have to do that, but I have kept it up since it's a quick way to get something on the blog for Monday. Since I don't have a regular job, it's a fairly mundane list.
Sunday, July 27, 2025
Sunday Stealing
I encourage you to visit other participants in Sunday Stealing posts and leave a comment. Cheers to all us thieves who love memes, however we come by them.
Saturday, July 26, 2025
Saturday 9: Rhythm of My Heart
Thursday, July 24, 2025
Thursday 13
Fictional Female Journalists/Writers
1. Lois Lane (Superman) – Dives into danger and conspiracy with a voice that says “This needs to be told,” even if no one believes her yet.Tuesday, July 22, 2025
Reflections from a Veteran Reporter
The Art of Newswriting
In an era when news often feels rushed and superficial, there’s something refreshing about looking back at the craft of reporting as it once was—where curiosity, patience, and empathy shaped the stories that truly mattered.
As a former weekly paper reporter, I learned early on that being a good journalist was about more than just asking questions. It was about listening deeply, holding space for the unexpected, and sometimes sitting in silence until the real story surfaced.
A long, pregnant pause in an interview can be unnerving for the subject, but it’s also a powerful tool. It creates a moment where the interviewee, caught off guard by the quiet, often reveals something genuine. It’s in these pauses that truth often hides.
And then there’s the closing question I came to rely on: “Was there something I should have asked you but didn’t?” This simple line can turn an interview on its head, prompting reflection and sometimes delivering the key insight that shifts the entire story.
Interviewing people in their homes added another layer of discovery. I learned early on to ask to use the restroom—not out of necessity, but as a chance to quietly open the vanity cabinet or take in what people collected when I could see into other rooms. A collection of salt and pepper shakers might not be the headline, but it adds texture and sparkle to an otherwise straightforward piece, helping readers see the subject as a real person with quirks and stories beyond the main topic.
All this had to be done on a tight schedule, generally forty-five minutes or less. Weekly newspapers don’t have the luxury of months to develop a story. Quick, sharp, and compassionate was the order of the day.
I especially treasured the “hit in the heart” stories—those about people with disabilities, or community efforts like the angel tree at Christmas. One year, my reporting on the angel tree helped raise $20,000—the most the local social services office had ever received. It was proof that words could move people to action.
It’s too bad that today’s news media often lean more toward entertainment than actual information. I saw my work as an educational guide for my readers, a way to give them facts and context they otherwise wouldn’t have, delivered in a way they could understand. I included backstory when necessary, so the issues became clearer and more meaningful. I wish today’s journalists would focus more on educating their readers than entertaining them. I think we would all be better off.
Today’s journalism landscape often prioritizes speed, clicks, and entertainment value over depth and empathy. The art of holding space in an interview, of asking the tough but thoughtful questions, seems to be fading.
But there’s a lesson in those quieter, more deliberate moments: true journalism isn’t about performance. It’s about building trust, being patient, and caring enough to wait for the real story to emerge.
As I reflect on my years reporting, I realize those experiences weren’t just about gathering facts. They were about honoring the humanity behind each story.















