Friday, October 24, 2025
Watching History Turn to Rubble
Saturday, June 14, 2025
Protest Day
NO KINGS
DUE PROCESS
NO SALE OF PUBLIC LANDS
NO CUTS TO MEDICAID, SNAP, ETC.
KEEP THE SOCIAL SAFETY NET INTACT
TAX THE BILLIONAIRES
BRING BACK JUSTICE AND THE RULE OF LAW
FREE AND UNFETTERED PRESS
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
Monday, May 05, 2025
Governmental Neglect
A Critical Look at Systemic Neglect
Since January, the current administration has enacted sweeping budget cuts that disproportionately affect healthcare, food assistance, and other essential social programs. While these measures are often framed as "cost-saving" initiatives, their consequences raise ethical concerns about governance and the treatment of marginalized populations, particularly low-income and disabled folks.
The Impact of Healthcare Cuts
One of the most significant policy shifts has been the reduction in funding for the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The administration has eliminated thousands of jobs within the agency, including positions at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). These cuts have led to the termination of health-tracking programs that monitor disease trends, environmental health risks, and public health emergencies. Without these programs, policymakers and healthcare providers lack critical data to address health disparities. Already the Covid-19 vaccinations for fall are at risk. How many will the newest strain kill?
Food Assistance and Economic Strain
The administration has also targeted food assistance programs, reducing funding for initiatives that support low-income families. These cuts disproportionately affect disabled individuals and those living in poverty, exacerbating food insecurity and economic instability. The justification for these reductions often centers on eliminating "wasteful spending," yet the long-term consequences may lead to increased healthcare costs and social unrest. I daresay the spending isn't wasteful to the mother trying to feed her children. Isn't the pro-life crowd in charge now?
A Systemic Pattern?
Some critics argue that these policy decisions reflect a broader ideological stance—one that prioritizes economic efficiency over human welfare. By systematically reducing support for vulnerable populations, the administration risks reinforcing social hierarchies that favor the elite while neglecting those deemed "unnecessary" or "unwanted." This approach raises ethical questions about governance and the role of public institutions in safeguarding citizens' well-being.
I would go so far as to say that the government is practicing a weird form of eugenics (trying to breed desirable qualities into people), as a type of "cleansing" of the kind of people that the oligarchy (or bro billionaires) find repugnant and unacceptable. After all, if they're dead, they can't breed. The government wants women to have more children, but I have the impression it's only the "right kind" of women they want to have those kids.
Conclusion
The current administration's approach to budget cuts is ill-advised, unwarranted, and unsound. I would much rather see a million dollars spent knowing there will be some loss to fraud than to end assistance entirely. The elimination of essential health and food assistance programs disproportionately affects marginalized communities, raising questions about the ethical implications of governance. As these policies unfold, it is crucial to examine their long-term impact and advocate for solutions that prioritize human dignity over economic expediency.
For further details on these policy changes, you can explore sources such as The Hill, Federal News Network, and The Conversation. Also check out HHS.gov for an outline on the official announcement regarding the transformation of HHS, including workforce reductions and policy shifts and HHS Fact Sheet, which details the restructuring plan, including budget cuts and consolidation of divisions.
-30-
Saturday, February 22, 2025
Hail to the Rich; Screw the Poor
| Vote (Tally) | Result | Question: Description | Issue | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 87 (52-48) | Agreed to | On the Concurrent Resolution: S.Con.Res. 7, As Amended; An original concurrent resolution setting forth the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2025 and setting forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2026 through 2034. | S.Con.Res. 7 | Feb 21 |
| 86 (49-51) | Rejected | On the Amendment S.Amdt. 1207: Merkley Amdt. No. 1207; To establish a deficit-neutral reserve fund relating to ending price gouging on prescription drugs. | S.Con.Res. 7 | Feb 21 |
| 85 (53-47) | Agreed to | On the Amendment S.Amdt. 922: Lee Amdt. No. 922; To establish a deficit-neutral reserve fund relating to Congress continuing its work to rein in the administrative state by supporting legislation that prevents Federal agencies from finalizing major rules without congressional approval, strengthens the Article 1 law-making powers of Congress, cuts spending resulting from costly regulations, reduces inflation, and unleashes economic growth. | S.Con.Res. 7 | Feb 21 |
| 84 (47-53) | Rejected | On the Amendment S.Amdt. 957: Lujan Amdt. No. 957; To strike reconciliation instructions requiring damaging cuts to programs critical to rural Americans and food assistance for American families. | S.Con.Res. 7 | Feb 21 |
| 83 (47-52) | Rejected | On the Amendment S.Amdt. 659: Blumenthal Amdt. No. 659; To ensure full and uninterrupted funding for Department of Veterans Affairs health care and benefits provided by the Sergeant First Class Heath Robinson Honoring our Promise to Address Comprehensive Toxics Act of 2022 (Public Law 117-168), also known as the "PACT Act", preventing any cuts or delays. | S.Con.Res. 7 | Feb 21 |
| 82 (49-51) | Rejected | On the Amendment S.Amdt. 971: Duckworth Amdt. No. 971; To establish a deficit-neutral reserve fund relating to protecting access to fertility services, and eliminating barriers for families in need of high-quality, affordable fertility services by expanding nationwide coverage for in vitro fertilization. | S.Con.Res. 7 | Feb 21 |
| 81 (48-52) | Rejected | On the Amendment S.Amdt. 699: Lujan Amdt. No. 699; To establish a deficit-neutral reserve fund relating to supporting police, which may include initiatives that provide funding directly to law enforcement agencies to hire or rehire additional career law enforcement officers in an effort to increase their community policing capacity and crime prevention efforts. | S.Con.Res. 7 | Feb 21 |
| 80 (48-52) | Rejected | On the Amendment S.Amdt. 436: Shaheen Amdt. No. 436; To establish a deficit-neutral reserve fund relating to preserving and extending vital tax credits enacted under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, which make heath care accessible and affordable and that have led to the lowest uninsured rate in our Nation's history. | S.Con.Res. 7 | Feb 21 |
| 79 (49-51) | Rejected | On the Motion S.Amdt. 233: Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Van Hollen Amdt. No. 233; To create a point of order against legislation that would cut funding from the school lunch or school breakfast programs. | S.Con.Res. 7 | Feb 21 |
| 78 (47-53) | Rejected | On the Amendment S.Amdt. 664: Slotkin Amdt. No. 664; To establish a deficit-neutral reserve fund relating to preventing reductions in funding and staffing necessary to respond to, control, and prevent avian flu. | S.Con.Res. 7 | Feb 21 |
| 77 (24-76) | Rejected | On the Amendment S.Amdt. 999: Paul Amdt No. 999; To require an adequate amount of deficit reduction as part of reconciliation. | S.Con.Res. 7 | Feb 21 |
| 76 (47-53) | Rejected | On the Amendment S.Amdt. 299: Reed Amdt. No. 299; To ensure continued United States support for the Government of Ukraine to stand firm against aggression by the Government of Russia in Europe. | S.Con.Res. 7 | Feb 21 |
| 75 (49-51) | Rejected | On the Motion S.Amdt. 172: Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Reed Amdt. No. 172; To create a point of order against legislation that would reduce Medicare and Medicaid benefits for Americans. | S.Con.Res. 7 | Feb 21 |
| 74 (48-52) | Rejected | On the Motion S.Amdt. 276: Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Baldwin Amdt. No. 276; To create a point of order against legislation that would take away health care from seniors, including those receiving care in nursing homes, through cuts to the Medicaid program. | S.Con.Res. 7 | Feb 21 |
| 73 (47-53) | Rejected | On the Motion S.Amdt. 1156: Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Wyden Amdt. No. 1156; To prevent millions of Americans from being kicked off their health coverage, suffering needlessly, getting sicker, and dying sooner. | S.Con.Res. 7 | Feb 20 |
| 72 (49-51) | Rejected | On the Amendment S.Amdt. 407: Ossoff Amdt. No. 407; To establish a deficit-neutral reserve fund relating to protecting access to maternal and pediatric health care through Medicaid. | S.Con.Res. 7 | Feb 20 |
| 71 (49-51) | Rejected | On the Motion S.Amdt. 776: Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Schumer Amdt. No. 776; To prevent tax cuts for the wealthy if a single dollar of Medicaid funding is cut. | S.Con.Res. 7 | Feb 20 |
| 70 (51-49) | Agreed to | On the Amendment S.Amdt. 1029: Sullivan Amdt. No. 1029; To establish a deficit-neutral reserve fund relating to protecting Medicare and Medicaid. | S.Con.Res. 7 | Feb 20 |
| 69 (48-52) | Rejected | On the Amendment S.Amdt. 316: Schiff Amdt. No. 316; To establish a deficit-neutral reserve fund relating to supporting Federal wildland firefighters and associated personnel. | S.Con.Res. 7 | Feb 20 |
| 68 (48-52) | Rejected | On the Amendment S.Amdt. 540: Bennet Amdt. No. 540; To establish a deficit-neutral reserve fund relating to reinstating the fired Federal employees at the Forest Service, National Park Service, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, and Bureau of Land Management. | S.Con.Res. 7 | Feb 20 |
| 67 (47-53) | Rejected | On the Motion S.Amdt. 925: Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Hickenlooper Amdt. No. 925; To create a point of order against legislation that would raise energy costs for Americans, including higher monthly electricity bills, building material expenses, and transportation costs. | S.Con.Res. 7 | Feb 20 |
| 66 (47-53) | Rejected | On the Amendment S.Amdt. 878: Murray Amdt. No. 878; To strike the reconciliation instructions and create a reserve fund to implement a bipartisan, multi-year agreement to provide up to $171,000,000,000 in discretionary funding for defense and up to $171,000,000,000 in discretionary funding for other programs, accounts, and activities to address border, veterans, farmers, food and nutrition, disaster relief, and other needs. | S.Con.Res. 7 | Feb 20 |
| 65 (47-53) | Rejected | On the Motion S.Amdt. 130: Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Warner Amdt. No. 130; To create a point of order against any reconciliation bill that would not decrease the cost of housing for American families. | S.Con.Res. 7 | Feb 20 |
| 64 (48-52) | Rejected | On the Amendment S.Amdt. 473: Merkley Amdt. No. 473; To establish a deficit-neutral reserve fund relating to the impacts of hedge fund ownership of single-family homes and rent prices. | S.Con.Res. 7 | Feb 20 |
| 63 (48-52) | Rejected | On the Motion S.Amdt. 494: Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Klobuchar Amdt. No. 494; To stop tax cuts for the ultra-rich while families struggle to put food on the table. | S.Con.Res. 7 | Feb 20 |
| 62 (47-52) | Rejected | On the Motion S.Amdt. 454: Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Schumer Amdt. No. 454; To prevent unwarranted tax cuts for the ultra-rich. | S.Con.Res. 7 | Feb 20 |
| 61 (51-49) | Confirmed | On the Nomination: Confirmation: Kashyap Patel, of Nevada, to be Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation | PN12-35 | Feb 20 |
Friday, February 21, 2025
What It Stands For
“MAGA stands for trying to erase trans people from existence. MAGA stands for resegregation and racism. MAGA stands for censorship and book bans. MAGA stands for firing air traffic controllers while planes are crashing. MAGA stands for firing the people overseeing our nuclear arsenal. MAGA stands for firing military veterans and those serving them at the VA, including canceling research on veteran suicide. MAGA stands for cutting funds to education, including for disabled children. MAGA is profoundly corrupt, unmistakably anti-democracy and most importantly, MAGA is explicitly a Nazi movement. You may have replaced a swastika with a red hat, but that is what it is.” - Chris Kluwe, former NFL dude
Monday, February 03, 2025
WARNING * WARNING * WARNING
This is from Heather Cox Richardson:
Billionaire Elon Musk’s team yesterday took control of the Treasury’s payment system, thus essentially gaining access to the checkbook with which the United States handles about $6 trillion annually and to all the financial information of Americans and American businesses with it. Apparently, it did not stop there.
Today Ellen Knickmeyer of the Associated Press reported that yesterday two top security officials from the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) tried to stop people associated with Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, from accessing classified information they did not have security clearance to see. The Trump administration put the officials on leave, and the DOGE team gained access to the information.
Vittoria Elliott of Wired has identified those associated with Musk’s takeover as six “engineers who are barely out of—and in at least one case, purportedly still in—college.” They are connected either to Musk or to his long-time associate Peter Thiel, who backed J.D. Vance’s Senate run eighteen months before he became Trump’s vice presidential running mate. . . .
Public policy expert Dan Moynihan told reporter Elliott that the fact these people “are not really public officials” makes it hard for Congress to intervene. “So this feels like a hostile takeover of the machinery of governments by the richest man in the world,” he said. Law professor Nick Bednar noted that “it is very unlikely” that the engineers “have the expertise to understand either the law or the administration needs that surround these agencies.”
After Musk’s team breached the USAID computers, cybersecurity specialist Matthew Garrett posted: “Random computers being plugged into federal networks is obviously terrifying in terms of what data they're deliberately accessing, but it's also terrifying because it implies controls are being disabled—unmanaged systems should never have access to this data. Who else has access to those systems?”
USAID receives foreign policy guidance from the State Department. Intelligence agencies must now assume U.S. intelligence systems are insecure.
Musk’s response was to post: “USAID is a criminal organization. Time for it to die.” Also last night, according to Sam Stein of The Bulwark, “the majority of staff in the legislative and public affairs bureau lost access to their emails, implying they’ve been put on admin leave although this was never communicated to them.”
Congress established USAID in 1961 to bring together the many different programs that were administering foreign aid. Focusing on long-term socioeconomic development, USAID has a budget of more than $50 billion, less than 1% of the U.S. annual budget. It is one of the largest aid agencies in the world.
Musk is unelected, and it appears that DOGE has no legal authority. As political scientist Seth Masket put it in tusk: “Elon Musk is not a federal employee, nor has he been appointed by the President nor approved by the Senate to have any leadership role in government. The ‘Department of Government Efficiency,’ announced by Trump in a January 20th executive order, is not truly any sort of government department or agency, and even the executive order uses quotes in the title. It’s perfectly fine to have a marketing gimmick like this, but DOGE does not have power over established government agencies, and Musk has no role in government. It does not matter that he is an ally of the President. Musk is a private citizen taking control of established government offices. That is not efficiency; that is a coup.”
DOGE has simply taken over government systems. Musk, . . . is personally deciding what he thinks should be cut from the U.S. government.
End Quote
This is from me:
This coup - I really don't know what else to call it - means that an unelected immigrant from South Africa now has all of most Americans financial information. If you or your company does any business with the government of any kind - direct deposit of your Social Security payment, your tax refund, your federal pensions, Armed Services benefits, grants, or even purchases the government made from your company - then all of your financial and personal information, including your tax records, Social Security number, address, etc., are now compromised.
We took steps over the weekend and removed most of our money from our account where our tax refunds were deposited and from the accounts where we paid estimated taxes. I suggest everyone do the same to ensure that this new government, which is no longer ours or following the U.S. Constitution, does not reach into your accounts and take your hard-earned money. I don't know that this will happen, but I also don't know that it won't. I'd rather be safe than sorry.
This is not a partisan issue. This is highly illegal and just plain wrong. I'm pretty sure no one voted for Elon Musk. He wasn't on the ballot.
Here are some links to articles about this. Don't take my word for it. Read about it yourself. I imagine some sites have spun it so that it doesn't look like what it is, and I know some people don't trust the media. But you must get your information from somewhere. See what they say about it. There are also other links to many different outlets in the HCR link above.
Warren Questions Bessent Over Musk Access to Treasury Payment System - The New York Times
Elon Musk’s Team Now Has Access to Treasury’s Payments System - The New York Times
Elon Musk’s Friends Have Infiltrated the General Services Administration | WIRED
We do not know what exactly Elon Musk is doing to the federal government - MSN
Senior U.S. official exits after rift with Musk allies over payment system - The Washington Post via MSN
Wednesday, November 20, 2024
The Elephant Won
Wednesday, November 06, 2024
Tuesday, November 05, 2024
VOTING TUESDAY
Wednesday, July 03, 2024
Wednesday, June 26, 2024
Hate Crime Update
Tuesday, June 25, 2024
The Hatred Among Us
Monday, June 03, 2024
Ridin' My Thumb to Mexico
This morning the news comes with the word that Mexico has elected a female president.
More than 100 countries, including the United States, have never been led by a woman.
We're supposed to be the leader in the free world, but that's just poppycock. We're so far behind the times in true freedom and liberty that it's a joke. We have lots of freedoms to do things, but not freedoms from things. Like the freedom to go to the movie theater and know we won't get shot in our seat. Or the freedom to be rid of advertisements we don't want. Or spam phone calls. Stuff like that.
I love my country, but the bass ackwards mindset of its citizens in among the more perplexing and aggravating things about it.
My state has never had a female governor. Other states have, but not mine.
My local Board of Supervisors has had females on it, and currently has one of five. Shouldn't that be more like three of two, when women make up half of the citizenry?
We have a female vice president and that scares a lot of people. Oh no, she might become president! She might do some good in the world! Horrors.
Crickey.
